Maybe I'm biased, but it seems if you sincerely believe the election was "stolen" (however you want to interpret that), then the best place to look is at the evidence and the arguments the Trump campaign lawyers are willing to offer in court. That seems to me the best filter to cut through the soggy chaff that is currently flowing around us. Because otherwise, the allegations are so numerous and so vague and sometimes so dramatic that it's impossible to keep up with except maybe if you're a journalist assigned exclusively to this beat. Does anyone disagree with this heuristic?
Secret Laser Watermarks on Ballots
Secret Laser Watermarks on Ballots
Secret Laser Watermarks on Ballots
Maybe I'm biased, but it seems if you sincerely believe the election was "stolen" (however you want to interpret that), then the best place to look is at the evidence and the arguments the Trump campaign lawyers are willing to offer in court. That seems to me the best filter to cut through the soggy chaff that is currently flowing around us. Because otherwise, the allegations are so numerous and so vague and sometimes so dramatic that it's impossible to keep up with except maybe if you're a journalist assigned exclusively to this beat. Does anyone disagree with this heuristic?